Fire Blanket Compliance Matrix
Fire Blanket Compliance Matrix
The DVM Fire Blanket Compliance Matrix is a professional evaluation tool informed by the requirements and principles of EN 1869:2019. It provides an objective structure for product assessment, evidence review, procurement documentation and supplier comparison in international supply chains.
This matrix translates relevant EN 1869:2019 requirements and the evaluation principles of the DVM Fire Blanket Reference into a structured, evidence-based comparison tool.
It is intended for professional buyers, distributors, OEM customers, private-label partners, quality managers, product managers and other technical decision-makers evaluating fire blankets and suppliers.
Independent TÜV SÜD fire testing, official test videos and the EN 1869:2019 test report for the DVM 1 × 1 m Fire Blanket Series are available on the dedicated TÜV documentation page.
DVM Fire Blanket Reference – Quick Navigation
You are here: Compliance Matrix. Use this matrix to compare products and suppliers objectively and document Pass, Fail or Not Applicable decisions with supporting evidence.
- Reference Specification Review the complete framework, definitions, technical requirements and documentary principles.
- Procurement Audit Checklist Apply a buyer-ready verification structure during tenders, purchasing and supplier selection.
- Normative Annex for Product Pages Review evidence-based product claims, wording requirements and documentary support.
- Inspection Guidelines Apply structured inspection, recording and replacement criteria throughout the product service life.
- Document Library Access all Fire Blanket Reference documents from one central location.
DVM Fire Blanket Compliance Matrix
Technical basis:
Informed by EN 1869:2019
Purpose:
Objective supplier comparison, evidence review and procurement documentation
The DVM Fire Blanket Compliance Matrix is part of a technical reference and procurement framework developed by DVM International B.V.
It is not an EN, CEN, ISO or government-issued standard. It does not create a separate product certification, constitute a legal conformity-assessment procedure or replace EN 1869:2019, applicable legislation, supporting test documentation or the manufacturer’s product instructions.
The matrix is intended for procurement files, supplier assessments, tender evaluations, technical reviews, OEM projects, private-label projects and structured product comparison.
It should be completed for the exact product configuration being evaluated, including the model, blanket dimensions, construction, packaging, artwork, instructions and language versions.
Instructions for Buyers
List each supplier or product in a separate copy of the matrix or add dedicated comparison columns where practical.
For every requirement:
- identify the supplier, product, model, size and packaging configuration;
- record the evidence reviewed;
- mark the result as Pass, Fail or N/A;
- add comments, identified gaps or corrective actions where required;
- retain copies of the supporting evidence in the procurement or quality file.
A requirement should only be marked Pass when objective, relevant and traceable evidence is available for the exact product being evaluated.
An unanswered field, general brochure statement or unsupported supplier declaration should not be treated as a Pass.
When a supplier states that a product “conforms to EN 1869:2019,” “is suitable for clothing fires” or “is suitable for cooking-oil fires,” verify the wording, product scope and supporting evidence using the Normative Annex for Product Pages .
Section 1 – Identification & Traceability
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EN 1869:2019 is identified accurately, including the applicable year or edition. | ||||
| The manufacturer, supplier or other responsible economic operator is identified with the required name and address information. | ||||
| A model, type designation or other unique product identifier is stated. | ||||
| A batch number or equivalent production identifier is present for traceability. | ||||
| Product markings, packaging and documentation identify the same model and product configuration. | ||||
| The product and supporting evidence can be matched to the exact model, dimensions, construction and packaging being supplied. | ||||
| Traceability records can link the supplied batch to the applicable product and production information. |
Section 2 – Dimensions & Intended Use
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finished blanket dimensions are stated in metres and verified. | ||||
| The blanket is rectangular or square. | ||||
| No side is smaller than 1.0 m or larger than 1.8 m within the dimensional scope applied by this reference framework. | ||||
| Clothing-fire positioning is used only for blankets measuring at least 1.2 × 1.8 m and supplied with suitable instructions and supporting documentation. | ||||
| Intended use is limited to small, incipient-stage fires that can be approached safely and completely covered. | ||||
| The product is not represented as suitable for fully developed fires, metal fires, reactive chemical fires or other applications outside its documented intended use. | ||||
| The product is not represented as a Fire Limitation Blanket for vehicle or traction-battery fire incidents. |
Section 3 – Construction & Deployment Performance
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric, seams, bindings and edges show suitable construction integrity. | ||||
| Edges resist foreseeable fraying or tearing during storage, extraction and deployment. | ||||
| The blanket can satisfy the applicable flexibility and deformation requirements without permanent damage. | ||||
| Pull-out force does not exceed 80 N. | ||||
| Extraction from the bag or box is possible within four seconds. | ||||
| Pull tabs and packaging provide a clear and intuitive removal method. | ||||
| Pull tabs are securely attached and suitable for the intended extraction method. | ||||
| Deployment evidence applies to the actual bag or box, folding method, pull tabs and product configuration being supplied. | ||||
| Construction and packaging remain consistent with the product covered by the supporting test and technical documentation. |
Section 4 – Electrical & Fire Performance
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical resistance of at least 1 MΩ is supported by applicable evidence. | ||||
| Electrical-resistance evidence can be traced to the product construction being supplied. | ||||
| Applicable EN 1869:2019 construction and fire-performance evidence is available. | ||||
| Cooking-oil and cooking-fat fire performance is supported by applicable evidence where kitchen or Class F suitability is claimed. | ||||
| Test documentation identifies the tested product, model, dimensions, construction and packaging configuration with sufficient clarity. | ||||
| Test evidence can be traced to the size, model and construction being supplied. | ||||
| Any differences between the tested product and the offered product have been identified and assessed. | ||||
| Supplier statements do not extend test results to unsupported products, dimensions, materials or packaging configurations. |
Section 5 – Marking, Instructions & Language
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Required user-facing marking is presented clearly and durably on the bag or box. | ||||
| The standard reference EN 1869:2019 is stated accurately. | ||||
| Product dimensions are stated clearly in metres. | ||||
| The product model, type or other unique identifier is stated. | ||||
| A batch number or equivalent traceability identifier is present. | ||||
| “FIRE BLANKET,” or the appropriate market-language equivalent, is displayed in capital letters with the applicable minimum character height. | ||||
| Required instructions and pictograms are supplied in the language or languages required in the intended market. | ||||
| Instructions explain clearly how to remove and deploy the blanket. | ||||
| Instructions explain how the user should hold the blanket while protecting the hands. | ||||
| Instructions include switching off the heat source where safe, completely covering the fire and leaving it covered until cool. | ||||
| Clothing-fire instructions are included only where the dimensions, intended use and supporting documentation justify that application. | ||||
| A discard-after-use instruction is provided. | ||||
| Periodic inspection guidance is provided. | ||||
| Packaging artwork and supplied language versions correspond with the approved product documentation. |
Section 6 – Procurement Evidence & Documentation
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier declarations identify the exact product and refer to the underlying evidence. | ||||
| Test reports identify the tested product and the applicable test requirements clearly. | ||||
| Technical data sheets correspond with the product being offered. | ||||
| Packaging artwork, drawings or photographs verify markings, dimensions, instructions and supplied languages. | ||||
| Production, inspection or traceability records are available where required for the procurement or quality file. | ||||
| Inspection and replacement information is available for the product. | ||||
| Marketing claims correspond with the actual evidence. | ||||
| Unsupported wording such as “EN approved,” “works on all fires” or equivalent absolute claims is not used. | ||||
| Claims of conformity with EN 1869:2019 are supported by evidence covering the applicable product requirements. | ||||
| Evidence remains valid for the product version currently being supplied. |
Section 7 – OEM & Private-Label Evaluation
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The OEM or private-label product uses the same construction, dimensions and deployment configuration as the product covered by the supporting evidence. | ||||
| Packaging artwork has been reviewed and approved before production. | ||||
| Required market-language versions have been agreed and checked. | ||||
| Manufacturer, brand-owner, importer and distributor responsibilities have been defined where applicable. | ||||
| Model, batch and production traceability remain available under the private-label presentation. | ||||
| Product, packaging or artwork changes are controlled and documented. | ||||
| The continued applicability of test documentation is reviewed after relevant product, material, size or packaging changes. |
Assessment Note
A product should only be treated as fully aligned with the DVM Fire Blanket Compliance Matrix when all applicable safety-critical requirements are marked Pass and are supported by suitable, relevant and traceable evidence.
Completion of this matrix is a procurement and documentary assessment. It is not a legal conformity-assessment procedure and does not create product certification.
A supplier declaration alone should not be treated as equivalent to an applicable product test report where a performance claim requires testing.
Missing fire-performance evidence, incorrect dimensions, unsafe or absent instructions, unsuitable language versions, inconsistent product configurations or loss of traceability may justify rejection even when other requirements have passed.
The buyer remains responsible for determining which legal, contractual, technical and market-specific requirements apply to the intended country and application.
Assessment Record
The completed matrix should also record:
- supplier and manufacturer name;
- product name and model;
- blanket dimensions;
- bag or box configuration;
- brand or private-label version;
- intended country or market;
- required language versions;
- assessment date;
- evaluator name or role;
- documents and evidence reviewed;
- document versions and dates;
- identified gaps and corrective actions;
- final procurement decision;
- approval conditions where applicable;
- date for review or reassessment.
Recommended Decision Categories
- Approved: all applicable safety-critical requirements have passed and sufficient evidence is available.
- Conditionally approved: limited non-safety-critical gaps remain and are subject to documented corrective action before supply.
- Further evidence required: the assessment cannot be completed because relevant documentation or traceability information is missing.
- Rejected: one or more safety-critical requirements have failed or the product claims cannot be supported adequately.
Related Reference Pages
Open the complete Reference Specification →
Open the Procurement Audit Checklist →
Open the annex for evidence-based product-page wording →
Open the Fire Blanket Inspection Guidelines →
Document Library
Download the Fire Blanket Compliance Matrix from the central Document Library.