Fire Blanket Conformity Matrix (EFRS-1:2025)
Fire Blanket Conformity Matrix
EFRS-1:2025 is a DVM-developed European Fire Blanket Reference Specification informed by the requirements and principles of EN 1869:2019. It provides an objective framework for product evaluation, procurement, documentary verification and supplier comparison.
Independent TÜV SÜD fire testing, official test videos and the EN 1869:2019 test report for the DVM 1 × 1 m Fire Blanket Series are available on the dedicated TÜV documentation page.
View TÜV SÜD Test Report & Videos →
EFRS – Quick Navigation
You are here: Conformity Matrix (Annex C). Use this matrix to compare products and suppliers objectively and document Pass, Fail or Not Applicable decisions with supporting evidence.
EFRS-1:2025 – Annex C
Purpose:
objective supplier comparison, evidence review and procurement documentation
EFRS-1:2025 is a DVM-developed technical reference and procurement framework. It is not an EN, CEN, ISO or EU-issued standard, does not create a separate product certification and does not replace EN 1869:2019, applicable legislation, supporting test documentation or the manufacturer’s product instructions.
This conformity matrix translates relevant EN 1869:2019 requirements and EFRS evaluation principles into an evidence-based comparison framework. It is intended for procurement files, supplier assessments, tender evaluations and structured product comparison.
Instructions for buyers:
List each supplier or product in a separate copy or additional column.
For every requirement:
- identify the product, model, size and packaging configuration;
- record the evidence reviewed;
- mark the result as Pass, Fail or N/A;
- add comments or corrective actions where required; and
- retain copies of the supporting evidence in the procurement file.
A requirement should only be marked Pass when objective evidence is available and can be traced to the product being evaluated. An unanswered field or unsupported supplier statement should not be treated as a Pass.
Claim verification: If a supplier states that a product “conforms to EN 1869:2019,” “is suitable for clothing fires” or “is suitable for cooking-oil fires,” verify the claim and evidence rules in the Normative Annex.
Section 1 – Identification & Traceability
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EN 1869:2019 is identified accurately, including the applicable year or edition | ||||
| Supplier, manufacturer or responsible economic operator name and address are stated on the packaging | ||||
| Model, type or another unique product identifier is stated | ||||
| Batch number or equivalent production identification is present for traceability | ||||
| Product and evidence can be matched to the exact model, size, construction and packaging being supplied |
Section 2 – Dimensions & Intended Use
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finished blanket dimensions are stated in metres and verified | ||||
| No side is smaller than 1.0 m or larger than 1.8 m within the applicable EFRS product range | ||||
| Clothing-fire positioning is used only for blankets of at least 1.2 × 1.8 m with suitable instructions | ||||
| Intended use is limited to small, incipient-stage fires that can be safely approached and completely covered |
Section 3 – Construction & Deployment Performance
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric, seams and edges show suitable construction integrity | ||||
| Pull-out force does not exceed 80 N | ||||
| Extraction from the bag or box is possible within four seconds | ||||
| Pull tabs and packaging provide a clear and intuitive removal method |
Section 4 – Electrical & Fire Performance
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical resistance of at least 1 MΩ is supported by applicable evidence | ||||
| Applicable EN 1869:2019 construction and fire-performance evidence is available | ||||
| Cooking-oil and fat fire performance is supported by applicable evidence where kitchen or Class F suitability is claimed | ||||
| Test evidence can be traced to the size, model and construction being supplied |
Section 5 – Marking, Instructions & Language
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Required user-facing marking is presented clearly on the bag or box | ||||
| “FIRE BLANKET,” or the national-language equivalent, is displayed in capital letters with the applicable minimum character height | ||||
| Required instructions and pictograms are supplied in an official national language of the intended market | ||||
| Instructions explain how to remove and deploy the blanket | ||||
| Instructions include switching off the heat source where safe, completely covering the fire and leaving it covered until cool | ||||
| Clothing-fire instructions are included only where the dimensions and intended use support that application | ||||
| A discard-after-use instruction and periodic inspection guidance are provided |
Section 6 – Procurement Evidence & Documentation
| Requirement | Evidence reviewed | Pass | Fail | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier declarations identify the exact product and refer to the underlying evidence | ||||
| Packaging artwork or photographs verify markings, dimensions, instructions and supplied languages | ||||
| Production, inspection or traceability records are available where required for the procurement file | ||||
| Marketing claims correspond with the actual evidence and do not use unsupported wording such as “EN approved” or “works on all fires” |
Assessment Note
A product should only be treated as fully aligned within the EFRS-1:2025 comparison framework when all applicable safety-critical requirements are marked Pass and supported by suitable, traceable evidence.
This EFRS assessment is a procurement and documentary comparison. It is not a legal conformity-assessment procedure and does not create product certification.
A supplier declaration alone should not be treated as equivalent to an applicable product test report where a performance claim requires testing.
Missing fire-performance evidence, incorrect dimensions, unsafe or absent instructions, or loss of product traceability may justify rejection even when other requirements have passed.
Assessment Record
The completed matrix should also record:
- supplier and product name;
- model, size and packaging configuration;
- assessment date;
- evaluator name or role;
- documents and evidence reviewed;
- identified gaps and corrective actions;
- final procurement decision; and
- date for review or reassessment where applicable.
Related Documents
European Fire Blanket Reference Specification (EFRS-1:2025)
Open the complete Reference Specification →
Procurement Matrix (Annex B)
Open the Procurement Matrix →
Normative Annex for Product Pages
Open the annex for evidence-based product-page wording →
Downloads
Download Annex C in your preferred language.