Fire Blanket Procurement Audit Checklist

Fire Blanket Procurement Audit Checklist

The DVM Fire Blanket Procurement Audit Checklist is a practical, buyer-ready verification tool informed by the requirements and principles of EN 1869:2019. It supports product evaluation, supplier comparison, tender documentation and procurement record keeping in international supply chains.

DVM Fire Blanket Procurement Audit Checklist
Technical basis: Informed by EN 1869:2019
Purpose: Buyer verification, supplier comparison, tender support and procurement record keeping

This checklist is intended as a practical first-stage or final-stage procurement control. It can be used during:

• supplier qualification;
• request-for-quotation and tender preparation;
• technical offer evaluation;
• OEM and private-label product development;
• pre-production document approval;
• incoming-product or supplier audits;
• procurement-file review.

A “Yes” result should only be recorded when the requirement is applicable and supported by objective evidence that can be traced to the product, dimensions, model, construction and packaging configuration being offered.

Abschnitt 1 – Identifikation & Rückverfolgbarkeit

1. Is the standard reference stated accurately as EN 1869:2019, including the applicable year or edition?
2. Are the manufacturer, supplier or other responsible economic operator clearly identified with the required name and address information?
3. Is a model, type designation or other unique product identifier stated consistently on the product, packaging and documentation?
4. Is a batch number or equivalent production identifier present to support traceability, investigation and corrective action?
5. Can the offered product and supporting evidence be matched to the exact model, dimensions, construction and packaging configuration being supplied?

Abschnitt 2 – Abmessungen & Verwendungszweck

6. Are the finished blanket dimensions stated clearly in metres and supported by suitable product or measurement documentation?
7. Are the dimensions within the applicable range used by this reference framework, with no side smaller than 1.0 m or larger than 1.8 m?
8. If the product is positioned for clothing-fire intervention, are its dimensions at least 1.2 × 1.8 m, and are suitable instructions and supporting documentation available?
9. Is the intended use limited to small, incipient-stage fires that can be approached safely and completely covered?
10. Are unsupported applications excluded, including fully developed fires, metal fires, reactive chemical fires and use as a Fire Limitation Blanket for vehicle or traction-battery fires?

Section 3 – Construction & Deployment Performance

11. Is the product construction, including fabric, seams, bindings, edges and pull tabs, consistent with the supporting technical and test documentation?
12. Is applicable evidence available showing that the pull-out force does not exceed 80 N?
13. Is applicable evidence available showing that the blanket can be extracted from its bag or box within four seconds?
14. Does the supplied packaging provide a clear and intuitive removal method, with pull tabs or a release system that are intact and securely attached?

Section 4 – Electrical & Fire Performance

15. Is electrical resistance of at least 1 MΩ supported by applicable test or measurement evidence for the product being supplied?
16. Is applicable EN 1869:2019 construction and fire-performance evidence available and traceable to the relevant model, dimensions and construction?
17. If the product is marketed for kitchen, cooking-oil or cooking-fat fire use, is the relevant fire-performance evidence available and traceable to the exact product being supplied?

Section 5 – Marking, Instructions & Language

18. Does the packaging provide clear, durable and consistent product marking, including:
    • the product name or appropriate market-language equivalent;
    • EN 1869:2019;
    • blanket dimensions;
    • model or type identification;
    • batch or traceability information;
    • the responsible supplier information?
19. Are the required instructions, pictograms and safety information supplied in the language or languages required in the intended country or market?
20. Are clear user instructions provided covering:
    • removal of the blanket from the bag or box;
    • protection of the hands during deployment;
    • switching off the heat source where this can be done safely;
    • covering the burning material completely;
    • leaving the fire covered until the material has cooled;
    • clothing-fire intervention only where the dimensions and intended use support that application;
    • discarding the product after use;
    • periodic inspection and replacement guidance?

Scoring Guidance

Critical Requirements

The following deficiencies should normally prevent unconditional approval, regardless of the numerical score:

• the product cannot be matched to the available test or technical documentation;
• applicable fire-performance evidence is missing;
• product dimensions do not support the stated application;
• pull-out or deployment performance is unsupported;
• required user instructions are missing, unclear or supplied in an unsuitable language;
• required product or batch traceability is absent;
• packaging or product construction differs materially from the documented or tested configuration;
• supplier claims extend beyond the scope of the available evidence.

Evidence Recommendations

For every “Yes”, the buyer should retain evidence appropriate to the requirement. Depending on the verification point, this may include:

• an applicable EN 1869:2019 test report or test summary that identifies the relevant model, dimensions and construction;
• cooking-oil or cooking-fat fire-performance evidence where kitchen or Class F suitability is claimed;
• documented measurements for pull-out force, extraction time and electrical resistance;
• technical data sheets, product drawings and material specifications;
• photographs or approved artwork showing packaging, markings, dimensions, pictograms and instructions;
• approved market-language versions of packaging and user information;
• batch-controlled production, inspection or traceability records;
• supplier declarations that identify the exact product and refer to the supporting evidence on which the declaration is based;
• change-control records for OEM or private-label configurations.

A supplier declaration may support the procurement file, but it should not be treated as a substitute for applicable product test evidence where a performance claim requires testing.

Additional OEM & Private-Label Checks

For OEM and private-label procurement, the buyer should also confirm:

• that the private-label product uses the same materials, dimensions and construction as the product covered by the supporting evidence;
• that the bag or box configuration and folding method remain consistent with the documented deployment configuration;
• that artwork and all required language versions have been reviewed and approved before production;
• that manufacturer, brand-owner, importer and distributor responsibilities are defined where applicable;
• that model and batch traceability remain available under the private-label presentation;
• that product, material, packaging and artwork changes are controlled and documented;
• that the continued applicability of test documentation is reviewed after relevant changes.

Procurement Decision Record

The completed checklist should identify:

• the supplier and manufacturer evaluated;
• the product name and model;
• the blanket dimensions;
• the bag or box configuration;
• the brand or private-label version;
• the intended country or market;
• the required language versions;
• the date of assessment;
• the name or role of the evaluator;
• the evidence reviewed for each answer;
• document titles, versions and dates;
• any identified gaps or corrective actions;
• the final procurement decision;
• approval conditions where applicable;
• the date for review or reassessment.

Retaining this information helps demonstrate that the procurement decision was based on documented product characteristics and objective evidence, rather than on marketing claims alone.

Recommended Decision Categories

• Approved: all applicable safety-critical requirements have been satisfied and sufficient evidence is available.
• Conditionally approved: limited non-safety-critical gaps remain and are subject to documented corrective action before production or supply.
• Further evidence required: the assessment cannot be completed because relevant documentation, test evidence or traceability information is missing.
• Rejected: one or more safety-critical requirements have failed, or the stated product claims cannot be supported adequately.

When to Use the Compliance Matrix

This Procurement Audit Checklist provides a concise twenty-point Yes/No assessment. Use the more detailed Fire Blanket Compliance Matrix when:

• multiple suppliers or products must be compared in detail;
• individual evidence items must be recorded per requirement;
• Pass, Fail and N/A decisions require comments or corrective actions;
• an OEM or private-label configuration requires detailed review;
• the assessment forms part of a formal quality or procurement file.

Related Reference Pages